Judge Jeffries at the Hants Lent Assizes
1683. The Lord Chief Justice having
taken his seat, the crier of the court made the customary proclamation, and
then the clerk of the arraigns read from the Commission of the Peace the names
of all the then magistrates of the county, seventy-eight in number, of whom
only sixteen answered to their names.
The judge frowned, and although he did not then speak, made an entry in
his note-book. The clerk of the arraigns
then summoned in succession the mayors of Winchester, Portsmouth, Lymington,
Christchurch, Whitchurch, Petersfield, Basingstoke, Romsey, Newport, Newtown
and Yarmouth; the bailiffs of Andover, Stockbridge, Alresford and Overton; and
then the three county, and four district coroners, of whom only five
appeared. “How is this?” shouted the
judge, as he laid his right hand violently on the desk. “This most miserable attendance is contumacy
to his sacred Majesty in the person of his own Chief Justice;” and then turning
to the High Sheriff, who was seated on his left hand, said in an angry tone,
“Sir, I would have you know that I think your County has disgraced itself. From upwards of five score persons whose
bounden duty it was to attend and hear our charge and, if required, to serve on
the Grand Jury, we have not one-fifth of that number,” “My lord,” said the sheriff, pointing to the
windows, “the weather is a fair excuse for many, and the roads, as I hear, have
become impassable.” “That is no excuse,” replied the judge in a surly
tone. The parties ought to have been in
Winchester, even as I was, overnight.
They must be made an example of, and shall be; and here we order and direct
that every one whose name has been called, and has not answered to the same, is
fined in the sum of ten pounds, which together will make an acceptable present
to the Treasury. And mind ye, Sir
Sheriff, that the whole of the fines be obtained and paid into His Majesty’s
Exchequer before the next Assizes, or otherwise we shall not only hold you
responsible for the money, but inflict a fine on you for the non-performance of
your duty.”
No comments:
Post a Comment